|
![]() |
|
||||
ENERGIA News Issue 2.1, February 1998Meeting ENERGIA MembersRose Mensah-Kutin
Interviewed by Margaret Skutsch Rose, first of all, please tell me a little about yourself and how you first got into energy planning. I was born in a little village in Ghana but I always aspired to the highest form of education because my father expected it of me and encouraged me at all times. I obtained a BA (Hon.) in English at the University of Ghana, Legon, and went on to a graduate diploma course in Communications Studies at the same university.
That seems like an interesting shift: what made you make this move? Was it that you found energy problems really interesting and fundamental to welfare of people? Actually, the reason I took up this job was because I wanted to do something different at the time. I felt I had contributed adequately to the issues of women through my journalistic practice and now I wanted space within the decision-making process itself to make some input. It was after I was engaged with the issues of energy as they relate to women that I found the area as interesting and useful to the needs of people as any discipline or area of work. What do you see as the most pressing problem as regards women and energy? I think that the most pressing problem in this area is the lack of adequate recognition and attention both in the discourses on energy, and in women and gender studies. The direct linkages between energy development and women's empowerment and gender equality does not seem to gain much importance as other topics such as health, education and employment. Energy continues to be seen as a gender-blind discipline and considered in technical and engineering terms basically. This limits the extent to which planning and policy making addresses the concerns of women in terms of participation in decision-making processes, capacity building and institutional strengthening, design and utilisation of end-use applications.
Many people concerned with women and energy see this mainly in terms of provision of household energy. From what you say, I think you are looking at other forms of energy and their impact on women's lives. Could you give some examples of this? Other forms of energy are Liquefied Petroleum Gas and Electricity. These are usually taken for granted and their impacts only drawn out in industrial terms but then there are issues like: when electricity becomes available, what decisions are made at the levels of the community and the household? In any case, do the policies that promote these energy options take note of their consequences on different socio-economic groups and gender relations? Are there any lessons for promoting LPG for use in educational institutions apart from the issue of cost-effectiveness for instance? The argument then is not to equate woodfuels with women but to identify the specific ways in which all types of energy sources affect women, men and the various socio-economic sectors in different ways. It is really very interesting that you have been able to take this line in your work. Have there actually been any setbacks or difficulties for you? I have had a lot of support in my work, especially in the early years of my employment in the Ministry. I had access to the resources to facilitate my work at the level of the Ministry. Among the communities that I work with as well, the people have always welcomed the participatory approach used in discussing issues and collecting information about the various energy resources that they utilise.
Do you have any plans for the future in your work? I have had the chance of participating in some training programmes in energy planning and research methodology in institutions in Italy and the U.S respectively. At the moment I have plans to improve my understanding of energy and gender issues by pursing a programme on the subject in an institution of higher learning abroad.
Is there anything in particular that has influenced your thinking about women and energy? Last year November, I was fortunate to be sponsored by the UNDP to participate in a meeting on Women and Energy held in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire. It was organised by the African Energy Programme (AEP) of the African Development Bank (ADB) in collaboration with the UNDP. I was extremely happy because it was the first time I was attending a conference on energy that had a continental and international character. Secondly and more importantly, the focus was on women and gender relations in the field of energy and it was extremely rewarding to know that the discourse on gender and women's advancement was being applied to energy issues. Prior to that meeting, I always felt isolated and out of touch because it seemed one was always saying different things from the dominant positions and views of the mainstream. For once, I felt I was being validated.
Finally, Rose: about combining a professional career with home and family, does this create problems for you, and how do you manage? I have been married for 17 years and I have four children of ages: 14 - boy, 10 & 8 both girls and 2, a boy. My ability to do my professional work vis-à-vis my family commitments is a result of three interrelated factors: my own perception of who I am and what I am worth, my husband's world view and support from other family members and friends.
If you wish to know more about Rose's work, please contact her through the ENERGIA News Secretariat.
| ||||||
Home - About ENERGIA - Strategies - Resources - Related Links - Sitemap | ||||||
| Updated on 17 February 2006 |